🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold policy to prohibit social media access for those under 16 is sending ripples internationally. Officials, campaigners, and parents are observing with great interest to see if this approach will inspire imitation for other nations.

The European Movement

Throughout Europe, a increasing number of nations are exploring similar bans.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the leader arguing that smartphones and apps are "stealing our youngsters' innocence". The policy could be passed soon.
• Norway is planning to enforce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to protect the young from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is developing a digital wallet to authenticate the age and identity of social media participants. The media minister have stated that an similar ban is "a potential measures on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has urged the legislature to approve a proposal increasing the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has endorsed a similar step, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Dutch government has advised guardians to restrict their kids from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has adopted a advisory statement calling for a ban for minors unless guardian approval is given. While it cautions of the "addictive" quality of these apps, the move does not establish mandatory rules.

"An effective age restriction is a good first step," stated a leading European lawmaker behind the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Approach

Across Britain, the government has kept open a possible ban, stating that "no option is discarded" but maintaining any policy must be "supported by strong research".

Last year, momentum gathered behind a proposal to introduce restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end watered down. However, the administration committed to conduct more studies the topic.

Campaign organizations have expressed apprehensions. A prominent charity established by the loved ones of a young person who died after viewing dangerous platform posts suggests that a simple age ban might not improve online safety and could create a "dangerous transition" of risk when users turn 16.

"This ban is a answer to the failure of the tech sector to design platforms and apps that are secure and suitable for children," commented a leading child protection advocate.

The United States: A Fragmented Landscape

Stateside, action is largely happening at the local level amid national gridlock.

• The state of Utah mandates parental consent for under-18s to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a law banning those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it faces court battles.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a law restricting minors to one hour of social media use per day, with additional use dependent on adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise enacted measures demanding guardian approval for under-16s to create social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from certain individuals to copy Australia's path, a nationwide ban is right now seen as improbable.

International Perspectives

Beyond these regions, other nations are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the required age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, world organizations adopt a more nuanced position. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "could backfire". The agency notes that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for marginalized children and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to prioritize child safeguards.

While this worldwide debate unfolds, the steps of this nation and its followers demonstrate that governments around the world are less and less prepared to stand by for the industry to act voluntarily.